Snapture

html.to.design vs Snapture: an honest comparison

Both turn the web page in front of you into editable Figma layers. If you came here from a search, the short version: they differ on browser permissions, on pricing, on how Auto Layout gets applied, and on what happens to your page. Everything below is checkable, and the cases where html.to.design is the better pick are listed too.

Snapture publishes this page, so read it the way you would read any vendor's comparison. Every claim about html.to.design comes from its public documentation, its Chrome Web Store listing, or its Figma Community page, all checked on 1 September 2026. If something here has gone stale, tell us and we will fix it.

The short answer

html.to.design is the established tool: around 700,000 Chrome users, a URL-paste import that needs no extension for public pages, multi-viewport and theme imports, a file format, an API, and an MCP server. It is a bigger product with more surface.

Snapture is narrower on purpose. It captures the page in your own tab and processes it there, requests no debugger access from Chrome, applies Auto Layout only where Figma's engine would reproduce the browser's positions within half a pixel, and publishes measured output instead of adjectives. The free plan is the whole product five times, not a reduced version.

Bar chart of what one Snapture capture produced per site, measured 1 September 2026: MDN 3,148 editable layers of which 1,463 text; Stripe 2,073 of which 629; Tailwind 1,533 of which 391 plus 200 design tokens; GitHub 773 of which 150.
Our own output, measured and dated. We publish the method at /proof/; we have no equivalent numbers for html.to.design because running a fair benchmark of their tool requires their Pro plan, and we would rather show one honest column than two unverifiable ones.

Side by side

Facts as of 1 September 2026. Sources: the html.to.design feature docs, PRO plan docs, and its Chrome Web Store listing; Snapture's own pricing and measurements.

html.to.designSnapture
Free plan10 imports every 30 days5 captures total, every feature included; importing into Figma never counted
Paid$18/month, or $12/month billed annually; fair use 1,000 imports/month$5/month or $49/year; capture limit removed, batch capture added
Chrome permissionsIncludes debugger (Chrome shows a warning banner; often blocked on managed devices)scripting, storage, declarativeNetRequestWithHostAccess; no debugger
Store data disclosure"Handles: Website content""Developer has disclosed that it will not collect or use your data"
Import without an extensionYes — paste a public URL into the Figma pluginNo — the extension is the product; captures happen in your tab
Pages behind a loginYes, via its extensionYes — the only path there is
Where processing happensTheir service builds the importIn your browser tab; the Figma plugin declares networkAccess: "none", which Figma itself enforces
Auto LayoutApplied broadly ("advanced auto layout")Applied only when a simulation of Figma's engine matches the browser within 0.5px; verified again at import and reverted if it moved
Design tokensText and colour stylesStyles, plus CSS variable names become Figma variables under the site's own token names
Multi-viewport importYes, free (desktop/tablet/mobile)Not in the shipped version
Dark/light theme importYes, freeNot in the shipped version
BulkBulk URL imports (PRO)Batch capture up to 30 pages per run, from a pasted list or the site's sitemap (Pro)
Ecosystem.h2d files, code.to.design API, MCP server, Figma Make supportNone of that — one extension, one plugin, a clipboard

When html.to.design is the better pick

When Snapture is the better pick

Frequently asked

Is Snapture an html.to.design alternative?

For single-page capture into editable Figma layers, yes. Both use a browser extension, both handle pages behind a login, and both produce real text, fills and Auto Layout. Snapture does not replace html.to.design's URL-paste import, its .h2d file ecosystem, or its MCP server, and its batch mode is capped at 30 pages per run against their fair-use 1,000 imports a month.

Which one is cheaper?

Snapture Pro is $5 a month or $49 a year. html.to.design PRO is $18 a month, or $12 a month billed annually. On free plans they count differently: html.to.design gives 10 imports every 30 days, Snapture gives 5 captures total with every feature included, and never counts importing into Figma. Prices checked September 2026.

Do they need the same browser permissions?

No, and this is the clearest technical difference. html.to.design's extension requests the debugger permission, which Chrome flags with a warning banner and many company device policies block. Snapture's extension requests scripting, storage and declarativeNetRequestWithHostAccess, and its Chrome Web Store listing carries the store's own "developer has disclosed that it will not collect or use your data" notice.

How this page was made

Prices and free-tier limits come from html.to.design's own documentation pages linked above. The permission list comes from the manifest visible in its Chrome Web Store listing. The data-disclosure lines are the store's own labels on each listing, not our characterisation. Snapture's numbers come from the pricing page and the measurements page, which states its method and dates. Nothing here was measured in a way you cannot repeat.

Try the claim, not the page. Snapture's free plan is five full captures — enough to run your own comparison on your own pages before believing either vendor. Add it to Chrome, capture something real, and check the layers panel.
Snapture Pricing What it produces Guides Support